Sunday 30 December 2012

Submarine: The game changer in modern naval warfare




Submarine
 The game changer in modern naval warfare

 


An announcement that India will spend more than $10 billion  to scale up it’s navy’s undersea combat capabilities has sent ripples in the defence industry world over. An existing submarine fleet consisting of just ten Russian Kilo-class, four German HDWs and an Akula-2 nuclear-powered attack submarine leased from Russia,this procurement plan definitely made militaries turn their heads.

 India's indigenously designed and built nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines of the Arihant class are expected to be commissioned soon. The lead vessel of the class, INS Arihant, was launched for sea-trials  in Visakhapatnam.  The Navy plans to have six SSBN's in service in near future. These nuclear-powered submarines will be a vital part of the nation's much desired nuclear triad.

 The Indian Navy operates a sizeable fleet of Sindhughosh and Shishumar class submarines. India has started construction of six Scorpène class submarines . These submarines will join the Indian Navy starting from the second half of 2015. India issued a request for information for another six submarines in 2011.
Whether patiently stalking their prey in two World Wars or carrying devastating nuclear missiles as a deterrent in the Cold War, submarines have played an often unseen but crucial role in the conflicts of the 20th century. A concealed military submarine is a real threat, and because of its stealth, can force an enemy navy to waste resources searching large areas of ocean and protecting ships against attack. This advantage was vividly demonstrated in the 1982 Falklands War when the British nuclear-powered submarine HMS Conqueror sank the Argentine cruiser General Belgrano. After the sinking the Argentine Navy recognized that they had no effective defense against submarine attack, and the Argentine surface fleet withdrew to port for the remainder of the war, though an Argentine submarine remained at sea.
 

 The first submersible was built in 1620 by Cornelius Drebbel, a Dutchman in the service of James I of England. It was created to the standards of the design outlined by English mathematician William Bourne. It was propelled by means of oars. The first military submarine was the Turtle (1775), a hand-powered acorn-shaped device designed by the American David Bushnell to accommodate a single person. It was the first verified submarine capable of independent underwater operation and movement, and the first to use screws for propulsion. During the American Civil War both sides successfully built working submarines. The Confederate States of America submarines were all designed to attack the Union blockade of Southern ports.

The first submarine not relying on human power for propulsion was the French Plongeur (Diver), launched in 1863, and using compressed air.The first air independent and combustion powered submarine was the Ictineo II, designed by Narcís Monturiol. Launched in Barcelona in 1864, it was originally human-powered, but in 1867 Monturiol invented an air independent engine to power it underwater. The 14 m (46 ft) long craft was designed for a crew of two, performed dives of 30 m (98 ft) and remained underwater for two hours.

 In 1870, the French writer Jules Verne, published the science fiction classic 20,000 Leagues under the Sea, which concerns the adventures of a maverick inventor of the Nautilus, a submarine more advanced than any at the time. An international success, the story encouraged inventors around the world to work towards making such a vehicle a reality. The first mechanically powered series of submarines to be put into service by navies, which included Great Britain, Japan, Russia, and the United States, were the Holland submersibles built by Irish designer John Philip Holland in 1900.[18] Several of each of them were retained in both the Imperial Russian and Japanese Navies during the Russo-Japanese War in 1904-1905.

Military submarines first made a significant impact in World War I. Forces such as the U-boats of Germany saw action in the First Battle of the Atlantic, and were responsible for the sinking of Lusitania, which was sunk as a result of unrestricted submarine warfare and is often cited among the reasons for the entry of the United States into the war.

At the very outbreak of war Germany had only 20 submarines immediately available for combat, although these included vessels of the diesel-engined U-19 class with the range (5,000 miles) and speed (eight knots) to operate effectively around the entire British coast. By contrast the Royal Navy had a total of 74 submarines, though of mixed effectiveness.

 During World War II the submarine force was the most effective anti-ship and anti-submarine weapon in the entire American arsenal. Submarines, though only about 2 percent of the U.S. Navy, destroyed over 30 percent of the Japanese Navy, including 8 aircraft carriers, 1 battleship and 11 cruisers. U.S. submarines also destroyed over 60 percent of the Japanese merchant fleet, crippling Japan's ability to supply its military forces and industrial war effort. Allied submarines in the Pacific War destroyed more Japanese shipping than all other weapons combined. This feat was considerably aided by the Imperial Japanese Navy's failure to provide adequate escort forces for the nation's merchant fleet. The Royal Navy Submarine Service was used primarily in the classic British blockade role. During the Second World War, its major operating areas were around Norway, in the Mediterranean (against the Axis supply routes to North Africa), and in the Far East. In that war, British submarines sank 2 million tons of enemy shipping and 57 major warships, the latter including 35 submarines.Before and during World War II, the primary role of the submarine was anti-surface ship warfare.

 The first launch of a cruise missile (SSM-N-8 Regulus) from a submarine occurred in July 1953 from the deck of USS Tunny, a World War II fleet boat modified to carry this missile with a nuclear warhead. Tunny and her sister boat Barbero were the United States's first nuclear deterrent patrol submarines. They were joined in 1958 by two purpose built Regulus submarines, Grayback, Growler, and, later, by the nuclear powered Halibut.In the 1950s, nuclear power partially replaced diesel-electric propulsion. Equipment was also developed to extract oxygen from sea water. These two innovations gave submarines the ability to remain submerged for weeks or months, and enabled previously impossible voyages such as USS Nautilus' crossing of the North pole beneath the Arctic ice cap in 1958 and the USS Triton's submerged circumnavigation of the world in 1960.


  Most of the naval submarines built since that time in the United States and the Soviet Union/Russia have been powered by nuclear reactors. The limiting factors in submerged endurance for these vessels are food supply and crew morale in the space-limited submarine. In 1959–1960, the first ballistic missile submarines were put into service by both the United States (George Washington class) and the Soviet Union (Hotel class) as part of the Cold War nuclear deterrent strategy.

 In naval warfare, the key is to detect the enemy while avoiding detection. Much time and effort is spent to deny the enemy the chance to detect your forces. A modern submarine is a multi-role platform. It can conduct both overt and covert operations. In peacetime it can act as a deterrent as well as for surveillance operations and information gathering. In wartime a submarine can carry out a number of missions including surveillance and information gathering, communication of data, landing of special operations forces, attack of land targets, protection of task forces and merchant shipping and denial of sea areas to an enemy.

 It has been thirty-five years since INS Khukri sank in the Arabian sea after being torpedoed by a Pakistani submarine. Captain Mahendra Nath Mulla chose to go down with his ship. Indian Submarine arm has since then come a long way. The pioneers of the Indian Submarine Arm underwent training in the UK and in the USSR. When our Navy set up its own Submarine Arm, it was natural that they should start about choosing a badge for the new elite force. Out of a large number of proposals a design was finally chosen that depicted two dolphins with the State emblem, the Ashoka Lions in the middle. It is that worn by all submariners, irrespective of rank.

 The day of the inception of the Indian Navy's Submarine Arm dawned cold and blustery on 8th December 1967, in Riga, USSR. There was a freezing northerly wind and the mercury stood at – 15 degrees Celsius. INS Kalvari entered her homeport of Visakhapatnam for the first time on 6th July 1968. She was received with great fanfare and the Chief of the Naval Staff, Admiral AK Chatterjee came down to Visakhapatnam to receive her. The then Flag Officer East Coast, Rear Admiral KR Nair, had the distinction of becoming the Navy's first Submarine Operating Authority. And four decades later we have a highly potent submarine arm which spearheads the navy and is a force to reckon.

Saturday 1 December 2012

Sino-Indian relationship of equals in 2012


Saturday, 01 December 2012

Sino-Indian relationship of equals in 2012
·         Fifty years hence, are the two neighbours a little more friendly?
For two countries who account for nearly 37 percent of the human race, 50 years from 1962, Sino-Indian ties are marked by friction over territory, Tibet and the role of US in their improving personal ties.

Beijing's  recent statement that India and China were “partners instead of rivals” with common interests in development , stirs a note that relations between the not-so-friendly neighbours seem to be maturing. 2012 not only marks the 50th anniversary of the Sino-Indian war, it is also the "Year of China-India Friendship and Cooperation" announced by Chinese President Hu Jintao and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but is a clear signal that the neighbours would like to hide the scars of the past.
 

1962 is one of the defining events in independent India’s history. Although a brief and localised affair restricted to the border areas, defeat in the war raised Indian awareness about the imperatives of safeguarding national security based on a correct understanding of international politics.

 According to the China's official military history, the war achieved China's policy objectives of securing borders in its western sector, as China retained de facto control of the Aksai Chin. After the war, India abandoned the Forward Policy, and the de facto borders stabilised along the Line of Actual Control.

Mao and the Chinese leadership issued a directive laying out the objectives for the war. A main assault would be launched in the eastern sector, which would be coordinated with a smaller assault in the western sector. All Indian troops within China's claimed territories in the eastern sector would be expelled, and the war would end with a unilateral Chinese ceasefire and withdrawal to prewar positions, followed by a return to the negotiating table.

The India-China war was fought in  harsh weather conditions entailing large-scale combat at altitudes of over 4,250 metres (14,000 feet). The war was also noted for the non-deployment of the navy or air force by either the Chinese or Indian side.

During the conflict, Nehru wrote two letters to U.S. President John F. Kennedy, requesting 12 squadrons of fighter jets and a modern radar system and  requested  that these aircraft be manned by American pilots until Indian airmen were trained to replace them. These requests were rejected by the Kennedy Administration (which was involved in the Cuban Missile Crisis during most of the Sino-Indian War).

 The non-aligned nations remained mostly uninvolved, and only the United Arab Republic openly supported India. Of the non-aligned nations, six, Egypt, Burma, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Ghana and Indonesia, met in Colombo on 10 December 1962.The proposals stipulated a Chinese withdrawal of 20 km from the customary lines without any reciprocal withdrawal on India's behalf. The failure of these six nations to unequivocally condemn China deeply disappointed India.



The aftermath of the war saw sweeping changes in the Indian military to prepare it for similar conflicts in the future, and placed pressure on Indian prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who was seen as responsible for failing to anticipate the Chinese attack on India. Indians reacted with a surge in patriotism and memorials were erected for many of the Indian troops who died in the war.

Arguably, the main lesson India learned from the war was the need to strengthen its own defences and a shift from Nehru's foreign policy with China based on his stated concept of "brotherhood". Because of India's inability to anticipate Chinese aggression, Prime Minister Nehru faced harsh criticism from government officials, for having promoted pacifist relations with China

 Post 1962 war India also reported a series of skirmishes which were never confirmed by China. One report provided by India shows that in late 1967, there were two skirmishes between Indian and Chinese forces in Sikkim. The first one was dubbed the "Nathu La incident", and the other the "Chola incident".

The declassification of one of India's most classified documents, the Henderson Brooks-Bhagat report is an event India has been waiting for, but in vain. The report submitted by Lieutenant General Henderson Brooks and then Brigadier Prem Bhagat to the government in 1963 outlines the reasons for the defeat of the Indian army in the 1962 border war with China. Sources claim that the report is a total of 28 volumes in which  four volumes contain the actual report  hand-typed  and the maps and military communications-practically every single order of importance issued during the war-- form another 24 annexures.

An open secret only two copies of the report exist : one copy in the office of the defence secretary and the other with Directorate General of Military Operations (DGMO).  



Fifty years hence Indian borders are no longer vulnerable to foreign offensives of the sort China had launched. Chief of the Army Staff, General Bikram Singh emphasised that the army had "plans in place" to ensure the country's territorial integrity was never again violated the way it was during the Sino-Indian war. "Such an event will not be repeated as the country's forces have got plans in place to protect the territorial integrity of the nation. I am assuring the nation as Chief of the Army Staff that 1962 will not be repeated. The country's borders are well protected and the army will not allow the enemy to cross it," he said.
For India, the haunting lesson of 1962 is that to secure peace, it must be ever ready to defend peace. If China were to unleash another surprise war, victory or defeat will be determined by one key factor which is India’s ability to withstand the initial shock and awe and fight back determinedly.